Key result
A non-contact remote photoplethysmography system using a smartphone camera achieved similar heart rate estimation results compared to a standard PPG optical absorption sensor.
Why the study?
The study aimed to build a low cost remote photoplethysmography system for both heart rate estimation and detecting real face using video based on signal processing techniques.
Does remote PPG using a smartphone camera accurately estimate heart rate compared to a standard PPG optical absorption sensor?
Population
Single subject or multiple participants recorded on video
Comparison
Remote PPG from smartphone camera video vs PPG optical absorption sensor
Authors
Loading...
Comparable smartphone remote PPG accuracy supports feasibility; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
Does remote PPG using a smartphone camera accurately estimate heart rate compared to a standard PPG optical absorption sensor?
A low-cost, non-contact remote PPG system using a smartphone camera can estimate heart rate with similar results to a standard PPG optical sensor, with potential applications in anti-spoofing face recognition.
Tran et al. (2022) studied Heart rate estimation. Remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) using smartphone camera vs. PPG optical absorption sensor was evaluated on Heart rate measurement accuracy. A non-contact remote photoplethysmography system using a smartphone camera achieved similar heart rate estimation results compared to a standard PPG optical absorption sensor.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: