Key result
HIV infection was associated with lower time domain parameters of heart rate variability compared to seronegative controls, with no significant differences based on virologic suppression status.
Why the study?
Does unsuppressed HIV viremia alter autonomic function measured by heart rate variability compared to virologically suppressed HIV patients and seronegative controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=57)
Does unsuppressed HIV viremia alter autonomic function measured by heart rate variability compared to virologically suppressed HIV patients and seronegative controls?
HIV infection is associated with altered autonomic function compared to seronegative controls, but unsuppressed viremia does not appear to further impact HRV parameters compared to suppressed HIV infection.
HRV reduction in HIV appears independent of suppression; leaves open prognostic value and need for longitudinal studies.
PURPOSE: HIV infection has been implicated in dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system. METHOD: Cross-sectional study examining the relationship between the presence of persistent detectable HIV viral load with autonomic function, measured by heart rate variability (HRV). Non-virologic suppression (NVS) was defined as having a detectable viral load for at least 3 months prior to autonomic function testing. HRV was measured during the following 4 maneuvers: resting and paced respirations and sustained handgrip and tilt. Inferences on parasympathetic and sympathetic modulations were determined by analyzing time and frequency domains of HRV. RESULTS: 57 participants were enrolled in 3 groups: 22 were HIV-infected participants with HIV virologic suppression (VS; undetectable HIV viral load), 9 were HIV-infected participants who had NVS, and 26 were HIV seronegative controls. There were lower time domain parameters in the HIV-infected group as a whole compared to controls. There were no significant differences in time domain parameters among HIV-infected participants. There were no differences in frequency domain parameters during any of the maneuvers between controls and all HIV-infected participants, nor between the NVS and VS groups. CONCLUSION: There were differences in autonomic function between HIV-infected individuals and HIV seronegative controls, but not between the NVS and VS groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in HIV infection (n=57). HIV infection and unsuppressed HIV viremia vs. HIV seronegative controls and HIV-infected individuals with virologic suppression was evaluated on Autonomic function measured by heart rate variability (HRV) time and frequency domains. HIV infection was associated with lower time domain parameters of heart rate variability compared to seronegative controls, with no significant differences based on virologic suppression status.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: