Why the study?
This study sought to determine associations between h-indices or m-quotients and manuscript publication in anesthesiology.
Observational (n=1,012)
Effect estimate: OR 1.80 (95% CI 1.52-2.14)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Higher h-indices and m-quotients of first and senior authors are significantly associated with an increased probability of subsequent peer-reviewed publication for abstracts presented at anesthesiology conferences.
Author bibliometrics associated with anesthesiology abstract publication success; hypothesis-generating for selection biases in academic publishing.
Anesthesiology is one of the increasingly competitive surgical specialties with a growing emphasis on scholarly activity. A metric of productivity and citation influence, the Hirsch index (h-index), can help identify mentors capable of guiding postgraduate trainees toward successful academic achievements. This study sought to determine associations between h-indices or m-quotients and manuscript publication in anesthesiology. Using the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) website, accepted abstracts from the ASA Annual Meetings from 2019 to 2021 were screened (n=2146). The first author (FAHi) and senior author (SAHi) h-indices, as well as the first author (FAMq) and senior author (SAMq) m-quotients, were collected for each abstract using the Scopus database. Whether an accepted abstract was subsequently published as a manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal was also noted, along with the number of days between ASA presentation and publication date. Linear and logistic regression models were used for statistical analyses. In total, 348 (34.4%) of the 1012 eligible abstracts were published as manuscripts. Mean FAHi, SAHi, FAMq, and SAMq, were significantly higher for accepted ASA abstracts that were later published in peer-reviewed journals compared to accepted abstracts that were not published (p<0.001). FAHi, SAHi, FAMq, and SAMq had significant positive associations with odds of publication (p=0.002; p<0.001; p=0.006; p<0.001, respectively). There was no statistical significance between FAHi, SAHi, FAMq, or SAMq and the number of days between ASA presentation and publication. Our study uniquely demonstrates the positive, direct association between h-indices and m-quotients with the probability of publication in anesthesiology. We propose that bibliometric indices are adapted to provide a refined perspective of a physician-scientist's capabilities. Postgraduate trainees can use these indices to discern research mentors primed to foster academic excellence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esmaeeli et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Anesthesiology research output (n=1,012). Higher h-indices and m-quotients vs. Lower h-indices and m-quotients was evaluated on Abstract publication in a peer-reviewed journal (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.52-2.14, p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: