This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A review of the content of the Journal of Career Assessment was conducted from the journal’s inception (i.e., 1993) through 2011. A total of 545 articles were analyzed for this content analysis. The content analysis was based on content, characteristics of empirical studies, and authorship. In terms of content, the major areas were career assessment, theoretically based articles, and issues related to special populations. Strengths of empirical studies included large sample sizes and ethnically diverse samples, whereas limitations concerned an over reliance on college student participants and not reporting information regarding race or ethnicity of the sample. The content analysis concludes with a list of the 15 most productive scholars who have published in the journal.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whiston et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: