Background: Although mixed venous O₂ saturation (SvO₂) accurately indicates the balance of O₂ supply/demand and provides an index of tissue oxygenation, the use of a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter is associated with significant costs, risks and complications. Central venous O₂ saturation (ScvO₂), obtained in a less risky and costly manner, can be an attractive alternative to SvO₂. Objectives: To investigate whether the values of ScvO₂ and SvO₂ are well correlated and interchangeable in the evaluation of critically ill ICU patients and to create an equation that could estimate SvO₂ from ScvO₂. Methods: Sixty-one mechanically ventilated patients were catheterized upon admission and ScvO₂ and SvO₂ values were simultaneously measured in the lower part of the superior vena cava and PA respectively. Results: SvO₂ was 68.6 ± 1.2% (mean ± SEM) and ScvO₂ was 69.4 ± 1.1%. The difference is statistically significant (p < 0.03). The correlation coefficient r is 0.945 for the total population, 0.937 and 0.950 in surgical and medical patients, respectively. In 90.2% of patients the difference was <5%. When regression analysis was performed, among 11 models tested, power model [SvO₂ = b0(ScvO₂)b1] best described the relationship between the two parameters (R² = 0.917). Conclusions: ScvO₂ and SvO₂ are closely related and are interchangeable for the initial evaluation of critically ill patients even if cardiac indices are different. SvO₂ can be estimated with great accuracy by ScvO₂ in 92% of the patients using a power model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ladakis et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: