Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares salbutamol and oxygen with HFNC for bronchiolitis, suggesting HFNC improves outcomes.
Introduction:As the benefit of many pharmacologic treatments for bronchiolitis is a source of debate, investigations of more effective, easy-to-apply treatment modalities of acute bronchiolitis remain upto-date. Methods:In this study, nebulised salbutamol plus standard oxygen (S) and HFNC (HF) therapies were administered to children younger than two years of age, with a respiratory clinical score (RCS) 4 points, who presented with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis. Results:The mean age of 72 patients was 7.80.4,and 59.7% were younger than six months.The mean RCS of the patients at admission was 8.422.026points.A significant decrease was observed in the mean RCS scores evaluated at 1-2-4-8 hours, from the first hour (p<0.05).The mean length of hospital stay and duration of oxygen therapy were 7064.6 (4-288) and 67.762.2(4-264) hours.Within the first few days after discharge, 50% of the patients returned to the pediatric emergency department (PED).The mean RCS showed a difference in favour of the HF group from the second hour of treatment (p=0.002).Expected improvement was not observed in 17.1% of the patients in the S group only, thus HF should be added.Patients in the HF group and patients in whom HF was added to S had higher hospitalisation rates (p=0.017),longer hospital stays (p=0.002), and longer duration of oxygen therapy (p=0.001).Readmission to PED after discharge was observed in 64.2% of the cases in the S group only (p<0.001). Conclusion:In this study, it may be said that HFNC treatment provides earlier and faster clinical improvement in children with bronchiolitis and reduces re-admissions related to the same disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kendir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: