Key result
The Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (SAPS III) independently predicted in-hospital mortality in CCU patients with acute myocardial infarction, with high scores significantly increasing mortality risk (HR 7.636).
Why the study?
Coronary care unit patients with acute myocardial infarction lack effective predictors of in-hospital mortality.
Does the SAPS III scoring system improve the prediction of in-hospital mortality compared to LODS, OASIS, and SAPS II in CCU patients with AMI?
Cohort (n=1,098)
No
Does the SAPS III scoring system improve the prediction of in-hospital mortality compared to LODS, OASIS, and SAPS II in CCU patients with AMI?
Effect estimate: HR 7.636 (95% CI 5.355-10.889)
p-value: p=<0.001
SAPS III is an excellent scoring system for predicting in-hospital mortality in CCU patients with AMI, outperforming LODS, OASIS, and SAPS II.
SAPS III may aid mortality risk stratification in AMI CCU patients; leaves open superiority over LODS, OASIS, and SAPS II.
Background Coronary care unit (CCU) patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) lack effective predictors of in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to investigate the performance of four scoring systems in predicting in-hospital mortality in CCU patients with AMI. Methods The baseline data, the logistic organ dysfunction system (LODS), the Oxford acute severity of illness score (OASIS), the simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), and the simplified acute physiology score III (SAPS III) scores of the patients were extracted from the fourth edition of the Medical Information Mart for Critical Care (MIMIC-IV) database. Independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality were identified by regression analysis. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared the area under the curve (AUC) to clarify the predictive value of the four scoring systems. Meanwhile, Kaplan–Meier curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to determine the optimal scoring system for predicting in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 1,098 patients were included. The SAPS III was an independent risk factor for predicting in-hospital mortality in CCU patients with AMI before and after the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The discrimination of in-hospital mortality by SAPS III was superior to that of LODS, OASIS, and SAPS II. The AUC of the SAPS III scoring system was the highest among the four scoring systems, at 0.901 (before PSM) and 0.736 (after PSM). Survival analysis showed that significantly more in-hospital mortality occurred in the high-score SAPS III group compared to the low-score SAPS III group before PSM (HR 7.636, P < 0.001) and after PSM (HR 2.077, P = 0.005). The DCA curve of SAPS III had the greatest benefit score across the largest threshold range compared to the other three scoring systems. Conclusion The SAPS III was an independent risk factor for predicting in-hospital mortality in CCU patients with AMI. The predictive value for in-hospital mortality with SAPS III is superior to that of LODS, OASIS, and SAPS II. The results of the DCA analysis suggest that SAPS III may provide a better clinical benefit for patients. We demonstrated that SAPS III is an excellent scoring system for predicting in-hospital mortality for CCU patients with AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=1,098). Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (SAPS III) vs. LODS, OASIS, and SAPS II scores was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (high vs low SAPS III score before PSM) (HR 7.636, 95% CI 5.355-10.889, p=<0.001). The Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (SAPS III) independently predicted in-hospital mortality in CCU patients with acute myocardial infarction, with high scores significantly increasing mortality risk (HR 7.636).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: