Key result
Delayed surgery for ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction significantly reduced hospital mortality compared to early surgery (0% vs 28%, p=0.004).
Why the study?
The optimal timing of surgery for ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction remains controversial.
Does delayed surgery improve mortality in patients with ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction compared to early surgery?
Observational (n=38)
No
Does delayed surgery improve mortality in patients with ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction compared to early surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.004
Delaying surgery for post-AMI ventricular septal rupture until 2 weeks after onset, when clinically feasible, may significantly reduce hospital mortality and reoperation rates despite an increased risk of catheter-related infections.
Delaying surgery may be associated with lower mortality in post-AMI VSR; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
The timing of surgery for ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. This study investigated the benefits and risks of delayed surgery for post-AMI VSR and examined differences in echocardiographic findings between early and delay groups.A total of 38 consecutive patients with post-AMI VSR who underwent surgery at our hospital between May 2003 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Our strategy was to delay surgery until 2 weeks after AMI. If patients demonstrated organ dysfunction, we considered early surgery. Patients were divided into early (n = 20; 53%) and delay (n = 18; 47%) groups. Risks and benefits were investigated based on echocardiographic findings during the waiting period. The delay group had more preoperative intravenous catheter infections (P = 0.008) but fewer reoperations (P = 0.02) and lower operative mortality (P = 0.04) than the early group. The VSR defect diameter and total pulmonary blood flow to total systemic blood flow (Qp/Qs) increased in both groups while waiting. Nevertheless, the early group had a significantly higher Qp/Qs change rate than the delay group (P = 0.05). The 30 day and hospital mortality rates were 5.3% and 13.2%, respectively.The VSR defect diameter and Qp/Qs in both groups increased with time and can therefore become risk factors. Nonetheless, the benefit of waiting exceeded the risk because our outcomes were better than those previously reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furui et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction (n=38). Delayed surgery vs. Early surgery was evaluated on Hospital mortality (p=0.004). Delayed surgery for ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction significantly reduced hospital mortality compared to early surgery (0% vs 28%, p=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: