Why the study?
Does direct mechanical ventricular assistance improve myocardial hemodynamics compared to CPR in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation?
Does direct mechanical ventricular assistance improve myocardial hemodynamics compared to CPR in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation?
Direct mechanical ventricular assistance provides physical diastolic augmentation that significantly improves myocardial hemodynamics during cardiac arrest in a swine model.
Does not support clinical adoption of DMVA; leaves open translation of hemodynamic benefits to human cardiac arrest.
Direct mechanical ventricular assistance (DMVA) is a method of biventricular circulatory support that employs a pneumatic device to apply both systolic and diastolic forces directly to the ventricular myocardium. This study investigated the effects of DMVA on myocardial hemodynamics when applied after a prolonged cardiopulmonary arrest. Seven swine weighting 28.3 +/- 2.5 kg were instrumented for regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurements using tracer microspheres. Ventricular fibrillation was then induced. After 10 min of ventricular fibrillation, CPR was initiated for 3 min. DMVA was then applied through median sternotomy. Defibrillation was attempted after 3.5 min of DMVA. If unsuccessful, DMVA was instituted for another 17.5 min and a subsequent defibrillation attempt was made. Arterial oxygen content (CaO2), coronary sinus oxygen content (CcSO2), myocardial oxygen delivery/consumption (mDO2/mVO2), extraction ratio (ER), and endocardial/epicardial blood flow ratio (EN/EP) were determined during CPR, during the initial application of DMVA (DMVA1), and after the subsequent 17.5 min of DMVA in those animals not initially defibrillated (DMVA2). Three of the seven animals were successfully defibrillated during DMVA1. After the additional 17.5 min of DMVA, only one other animal was defibrillated. There was a significant improvement in CaO2, CcSO2, MBF, mDO2, mVO2, ER, and EN/EP after DMVA1 compared to CPR. Only mVO2 and ER improved significantly after DMVA2. These findings support the concept that physical diastolic augmentation may improve myocardial hemodynamics when DMVA is applied during cardiac arrest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: