Key result
Metabolic syndrome is present in approximately one third of non-diabetic patients with primary hypertension and predicts an increased probability of cardiovascular events or death.
Why the study?
Do renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers prevent metabolic side effects compared to beta blockers and diuretics in patients with primary hypertension and insulin resistance?
Do renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers prevent metabolic side effects compared to beta blockers and diuretics in patients with primary hypertension and insulin resistance?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with primary hypertension and insulin resistance, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers should be preferred over beta blockers and diuretics to minimize metabolic side effects.
The metabolic syndrome can be found in approximately one third of patients who do not have diabetes but have primary hypertension. Its presence has been associated with a wide range of traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors and early signs of cardiovascular and renal damage. Moreover, it was emphasized recently that the metabolic syndrome predicts an increased probability of sustaining a cardiovascular event or dying. In the clinical setting of insulin resistance, attention should be paid to the metabolic side effects of antihypertensive drugs; therefore, preference should be given to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers rather than to beta blockers and diuretics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratto et al. (2006) conducted a review in Primary hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers vs. Beta blockers and diuretics was evaluated. Metabolic syndrome is present in approximately one third of non-diabetic patients with primary hypertension and predicts an increased probability of cardiovascular events or death.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: