Key result
SMOTETomek outperforms other data balancing methods in accuracy when training Support Vector Machine models.
Why the study?
Severe class imbalance causes machine learning models to bias toward dominant classes, yet research into class balancing methods remains relatively limited.
SMOTETomek is the most accurate method for handling highly imbalanced data in machine learning models like SVM.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SMOTETomek may enhance SVM accuracy on imbalanced data; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
To enhance the performance of a Machine Learning (ML) model on class-imbalanced data, this study will analyze different approaches toward class balancing. High-class imbalance is inherently prevalent in numerous practical applications such as fraud detection and rare disease diagnosis, making successful categorization with imbalanced data a significant field of study. In addition, the problem is exacerbated by severely imbalanced data because most ML models will show bias towards the dominant class and, in the worst cases, neglect the minority class completely. There has been relatively limited research in the domain of class balancing methods, despite recent breakthroughs in handling imbalance data approaches and growing popularity. In this research, we create and evaluate several methods for balancing data, including Random Under Sampling (RUS), Random Over Sampling (ROS), Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN), Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique Tomek (SMOTETomek). We use credit card fraud detection data for our research. This data went through a process of data balancing treatment. Then, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) ML approach is trained with the help of evenly distributed data. SVM mode results for all of the aforementioned balancing data types are evaluated, and the optimum method for handling imbalanced data is determined. The outcome demonstrates that the SMOTETomek method is superior to others in terms of accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manimuthu Ayyannan (2024) studied Class-imbalanced data (credit card fraud detection). Data balancing methods (SMOTETomek, SMOTE, ADASYN, ROS, RUS) was evaluated on Accuracy. The SMOTETomek method for handling imbalanced data was superior to other balancing methods (RUS, ROS, ADASYN, SMOTE) in terms of accuracy when training a Support Vector Machine model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: