This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose provide a first understanding on the constraints historical video collections pose to video technology and the potential that an online access offers to both archive and users. /methodology/approach small and unique collection of videos on customs and folklore was used as case study. Multiple were used to investigate the effectiveness of technology and the modality of user access. keyframe extraction was tested on the visual content while the audio stream was used to classification of speech and music clips. The user access (search vs. browse) was in a controlled user evaluation. A focus group and a survey provided insight on the actual of the analogue archive. The results of these many studies was then compared and integrated (triangulation). amateur material challenged automatic techniques for video and audio indexing thus that the technology must be tested against the material before deciding on a digitization . Two user interaction modalities, browsing vs. searching, were tested in a user evaluation. show users preferred searching but browsing becomes essential when the search engine in matching query and indexed words. Browsing was also valued for serendipitous discovery; the organization of the archive was judged cryptic and therefore of limited use. This that the categorization of an online archive has to be thought in terms of users who might understand the current classification. The focus group and the survey showed clearly the of an online access even when the quality of the video surrogate is poor. The evidence suggests that the creation of a digital version of a video archive requires a re-thinking of collection in terms of the new medium: a new archive should be specially designed to exploit potential the digital medium offers. Similarly user’s needs have to be considered before the digital library interface as needs are likely to be different than those imagined. limitations/implications study is limited to a single archive; other institutions provided the technology used on which had no influence. implications guidelines drawn as result of this study could impact on the strategy and policy of digitization that include video archives. /value paper is the first attempt to understand the advantages offered and limitations hold by video technology for small video archives like those often found in special collections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petrelli et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: