Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the realm of higher education, understanding the intricate relationship between university ranking indicators and university business processes is paramount for enhancing institutional competitiveness. However, existing scientific literature presents a notable gap in establishing a clear linkage between these two domains. This study endeavors to bridge this gap by investigating the correlation between global university ranking indicators and university business processes. The primary goal of this research is to establish a connection between the indicators of global university ranking systems and university business processes. Through a systematic literature review, we identify the relationships and significance of selected ranking indicators in the implementation of specific university business processes. The study identifies significant correlations between global university ranking indicators and various business processes, particularly within the research domain. The study faces certain limitations, primarily due to the limited availability of scientific literature that directly explores the relationship between university ranking indicators and business processes. It can be concluded that the research process area is crucial for enhancing the university's competitiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukić et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: