Key result
The ML2VCG transformation significantly reduced median RMSE values for leads X (13.9µV), Y (15.1µV), and Z (2.6µV) compared to the 2step method when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs.
Why the study?
Does the ML2VCG transformation reduce RMSE compared to a 2step method when deriving Frank VCGs from Mason-Likar 12-lead ECGs?
Does the ML2VCG transformation reduce RMSE compared to a 2step method when deriving Frank VCGs from Mason-Likar 12-lead ECGs?
Effect estimate: Reduction of median RMSE: X 13.9µV, Y 15.1µV, Z 2.6µV
p-value: p=<0.001
A direct transformation method (ML2VCG) provides a more accurate derivation of Frank vectorcardiograms from Mason-Likar 12-lead ECGs than a two-step approach.
Vectorcardiograpic (VCG) parameters can supplement the diagnostic information of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Nevertheless, the VCG is seldom recorded in modern-day practice. A common approach today is to derive the Frank VCG from the standard 12-lead ECG (distal limb electrode positions). There is, to date no direct method that allows for a transformation from 12-lead ECGs with proximal limb electrode positions (Mason-Likar (ML) 12-lead ECG), to Frank VCGs. In this research, we develop such a transformation (ML2VCG) by means of multivariate linear regression on a training data set of 545 ML 12-lead ECGs and corresponding Frank VCGs that were both extracted surface potential maps (BSPMs). We compare the performance of the ML2VCG method against an alternative approach (2step method) that utilizes two existing transformations that are applied consecutively (ML 12-lead ECG to standard 12-lead ECG and subsequently to Frank VCG). We quantify the performance of ML2VCG and 2step on an unseen test dataset (181 ML 12-lead ECGs and corresponding Frank VCGs again extracted from BSPMs) through root mean squared error (RMSE) values, calculated over the QRST, between actual and transformed Frank leads. The ML2VCG transformation achieved a reduction of the median RMSE values for leads X (13.9µV; p<.001), Y (15.1µV; p<.001) and Z (2.6µV; p=.001) when compared to the 2step transformation. Our results show that the 2step method may not be optimal when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs. The utilization of the herein developed ML2VCG transformation should thus be considered when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guldenring et al. (2012) studied this question. ML2VCG transformation vs. 2step method was evaluated on Root mean squared error (RMSE) over the QRST between actual and transformed Frank leads (Reduction of median RMSE: X 13.9µV, Y 15.1µV, Z 2.6µV, p=<0.001). The ML2VCG transformation significantly reduced median RMSE values for leads X (13.9µV), Y (15.1µV), and Z (2.6µV) compared to the 2step method when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: