PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1990Journal of Biological Chemistry100 citationsOpen Access

Hydrolysis and transport of proline-containing peptides in renal brush-border membrane vesicles from dipeptidyl peptidase IV-positive and dipeptidyl peptidase IV-negative rat strains.

View Full Paper
CTChinnaswamy TiruppathìIllinois CollegeYMYusei MiyamotoThe University of Osaka
Vadivel Ganapathy
Vadivel GanapathyUniversity of Southern California

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this investigation, we have demonstrated that the renal brush-border membrane of Fischer 344 rats from the Japanese Charles River Inc. specifically lacks dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) activity, whereas the renal brush-border membrane of Fischer 344 rats from three different sources within the United States possesses normal levels of DPP IV activity. Comparison of the brush-border proteins between Charles River (U.S.A.) Fischer 344 rats (DPP IV positive) and Japanese Charles River Fischer 344 rats (DPP IV negative) revealed that a protein band (Mr = 100,000), apparently identical with DPP IV, was absent in the membranes from Japanese Charles River Fischer 344 rats. We examined the handling of radiolabeled beta-casomorphin fragment 1-5 (Tyr-Pro-3HPhe-Pro-Gly), a specific substrate for DPP IV, in renal brush-border membrane vesicles isolated from DPP IV-positive and DPP IV-negative rats. Although the membrane vesicles from DPP IV-positive rats were able to hydrolyze the pentapeptide to di- and tripeptides with the subsequent active transport of these products via the H+ gradient-dependent peptide transport system, the membrane vesicles from DPP IV-negative rats failed to hydrolyze the pentapeptide and hence lacked the ability to transport the radiolabel actively from the parent peptide. The H+ gradient-dependent glycyl-sarcosine uptake and the Na+ gradient-dependent proline uptake, however, were normal in DPP IV-negative rats. Urine analysis revealed that the DPP IV-negative rats excreted proline- and hydroxyproline-containing peptides in significantly increased amounts in their urine compared with control rats. Furthermore, following intravenous administration of Tyr-Pro-Phe-Pro-NH2, a peptide that is exclusively hydrolyzed by DPP IV, urinary excretion of the peptide in the intact form was many-fold greater in DPP IV-negative rats than in control rats. These data provide conclusive evidence for the obligatory role of DPP IV in the renal handling of proline (and hydroxyproline)-containing peptides.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tiruppathì et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d72c01e7099f691057200https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)40041-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ON THE COLORIMETRIC DETERMINATION OF CREATININE BY THE JAFFE REACTION1945 · 2,014 citations
  2. 2Distribution of a dipeptide naphthylamidase in rat tissues and its localisation by using diazo coupling and labeled antibody techniques1969 · 80 citations
  3. 3Carrier-mediated transport of glycyl-L-proline in renal brush border vesicles1980 · 31 citations
  4. 4Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T41970 · 252,056 citations
  5. 5Renal tubular processing of small peptide hormones.1982 · 75 citations