Key result
2-D DCNNs improve stride length and velocity estimation by up to ~39% versus conventional techniques.
Why the study?
Traditional methods for estimating stride length and velocity rely on zero-velocity phases that are difficult to detect in institutionalized older adults, while existing deep learning models require hard-to-collect subject-specific labeled data.
Does 2-D DCNN improve the estimation of stride length and velocity compared to conventional techniques in institutionalized older adults?
Does 2-D DCNN improve the estimation of stride length and velocity compared to conventional techniques in institutionalized older adults?
Deep convolutional neural networks provide more accurate estimates of stride length and velocity than conventional techniques in institutionalized older adults, without requiring subject-specific labeled data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance gait monitoring in institutionalized older adults; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Extracting stride length and velocity from wearable sensors is traditionally based on the double integration of accelerometer data with zero-velocity update (ZUPT) technique. However, this approach might not be suitable for institutionalized older adults, whose clear zero-velocity phase cannot be detected accurately. While deep learning models have been proposed to overcome this limitation, these approaches need subject-specific labeled data, which are difficult to collect in practice, to calibrate the models. We show that 2-D deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) can be used to extract accurate estimates of stride length and velocity with instrumented footwear. Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation is used to avoid overfitting of the results to deep learning models on data collected from <tex-math notation="LaTeX">N=95 </tex-math> institutionalized older adults with two different stride definitions during the 6-min walk test (6MWT). When stride is defined from the initial contact (IC) to the next IC, DCNNs result in better interrater reliability and improved performance by 38.8% and 31.2% relative to conventional techniques (i.e., the double integration method with ZUPT technique) for stride length and velocity, respectively. The performance of DCNNs does not degrade substantially when the stride is defined from the foot-flat (FF) phase (i.e., zero-velocity phase) to the next FF phase. Deep learning models are robust to intersubject variability without requiring subject-specific labeled data, indicating the potential of their use for out-of-the-lab gait analysis. Their performance is independent of stride definitions, making them more suitable for institutionalized older adults than conventional techniques, where ICs can be reliably detected even when they do not occur under the hindfoot.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied Institutionalized older adults (n=95). 2-D deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) with instrumented footwear vs. Conventional techniques (double integration method with ZUPT technique) was evaluated on Estimation of stride length and velocity (38.8% improvement for stride length, 31.2% for velocity). 2-D deep convolutional neural networks improved the estimation of stride length and velocity by 38.8% and 31.2%, respectively, compared to conventional techniques in institutionalized older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: