Key result
A delay of 203 ms under left atrial appendage pacing indicated successful anterior mitral line block with 92% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 90% positive predictive value.
Why the study?
Do novel electrocardiographic criteria (P-wave delay under LAA pacing) accurately assess anterior mitral line block in patients with perimitral flutter after atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cohort (n=129)
Do novel electrocardiographic criteria (P-wave delay under LAA pacing) accurately assess anterior mitral line block in patients with perimitral flutter after atrial fibrillation ablation?
A novel ECG criterion using a P-wave delay of 203 ms under LAA pacing provides highly sensitive and specific real-time confirmation of anterior mitral line block during ablation for perimitral flutter.
May aid real-time AML block assessment during flutter ablation; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesized that P-wave morphology and timing under left atrial appendage (LAA) pacing change characteristically immediately upon anterior mitral line (AML) block. BACKGROUND: Perimitral flutter commonly occurs following ablation of atrial fibrillation and can be cured by an AML. However, confirmation of bidirectional block can be challenging, especially in severely fibrotic atria. METHODS: The study analyzed 129 consecutive patients (66 ± 8 years, 64% men) who developed perimitral flutter after atrial fibrillation ablation. We designed electrocardiography criteria in a retrospective cohort (n = 76) and analyzed them in a validation cohort (n = 53). RESULTS: delay was used as a criterion applicable in all cases (n = 129) with a delay of 203 ms indicating successful block (sensitivity 92%, specificity 84%, positive predictive value 90%, negative predictive value 87%). Furthermore, an initial negative P-wave portion in the inferior leads was observed, which was attenuated in case of additional cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Computational P-wave simulations provide mechanistic confirmation of these findings for diverse ablation scenarios (pulmonary vein isolation ± AML ± roof line ± cavotricuspid isthmus ablation). CONCLUSIONS: delay are novel real-time electrocardiography criteria allowing fast and straightforward assessment of AML block during ablation for perimitral flutter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehrmann et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Perimitral flutter after atrial fibrillation ablation (n=129). Electrocardiographic criteria (delay of 203 ms) was evaluated on Successful anterior mitral line block. A delay of 203 ms under left atrial appendage pacing indicated successful anterior mitral line block with 92% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 90% positive predictive value.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: