Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
CO 2 capture, both from Direct Air Capture (DAC) and Post-Combustion (PCC) using liquid and solid amine sorbents, received enormous attention due to worsening weather and climate change. Enhancing the efficiency of CO 2 capture and removal technologies is crucial, with a primary focus on reducing the energy demand for continuous capture-release cycles. Low-energy CO 2 removal strategies offer promising durability and low operational costs, and a low levelized cost per ton of CO 2 removal is preferred for large-scale implementation. This review highlights low-energy CO 2 removal approaches, such as moisture/humidity swing sorbents. This discussion covers the influence of structural and molecular characteristics, the effect of counter anions on CO 2 removal efficiency and kinetics, the impact of different operational factors on performance, and the long-term stability of these materials. Continuous exploration and optimization of these materials and methods are vital for advancing the moisture swing method, contributing to global efforts to combat climate change and promoting environmental sustainability. Finally, recommendations are provided for the design of innovative materials.
Singh et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: