Key result
Cardiac monitoring for durations beyond the guideline-recommended 30-day period results in greater atrial fibrillation yield in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Why the study?
Does prolonged outpatient cardiac monitoring improve the detection of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke patients?
Does prolonged outpatient cardiac monitoring improve the detection of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke patients?
Prolonged cardiac monitoring beyond 30 days is important for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke to guide secondary prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support extended monitoring in cryptogenic stroke; leaves open optimal duration and outcome impact.
Cryptogenic strokes are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Identifying the underlying cause of cryptogenic stroke is imperative for appropriate short and long-term management of these patients. In particular, detecting atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke patients may shed insight into the cause of the index stroke, but is also important to identify an important cause of secondary stroke. There is accumulating evidence indicating that monitoring for durations beyond the guideline recommended 30 day-period results in greater atrial fibrillation yield. This article reviews current guidelines and practices for the diagnosis of cryptogenic stroke, as well as outpatient cardiac monitoring options available, and focuses on the role that hospitalists have to play in the care of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alpesh Amin (2016) conducted a review in Cryptogenic stroke and atrial fibrillation. Outpatient cardiac monitoring was evaluated. Cardiac monitoring for durations beyond the guideline-recommended 30-day period results in greater atrial fibrillation yield in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: