Key result
Intermittent pneumatic compression accelerates mean blood pressure recovery by ~10% vs sham after sprint exercise.
Why the study?
Intermittent pneumatic compression facilitates lymph and blood flow to reduce exercise-induced tissue fluid accumulation, but its effects on cardiovascular recovery compared with passive recovery required evaluation.
Does intermittent pneumatic compression improve the recovery of cardiovascular parameters after repeated sprint exercise in healthy trained individuals?
RCT (n=16)
Randomized, counterbalanced, crossover
No
Does intermittent pneumatic compression improve the recovery of cardiovascular parameters after repeated sprint exercise in healthy trained individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 102.5% vs 92.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
The application of intermittent pneumatic compression after high-intensity sprint exercise accelerates the recovery of cardiovascular parameters, reducing cardiovascular strain.
IPC hastens post-sprint BP recovery in trained individuals; extends RCT evidence on recovery modalities to cardiovascular parameters.
PURPOSE: Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) applies gradual pressure to facilitate lymph and blood flow movement to reduce exercise-induced tissue fluid accumulation and plasma volume loss. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular system response during the recovery with IPC compared with passive recovery (Sham). METHODS: Sixteen volunteers (7 females and 9 males) executed a cycling-based exhausting sprint interval exercise (8 × 20 s all out), followed by a 30-min IPC or Sham condition. Participants performed two trials in a randomised, counterbalanced, and crossover design. Several cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, heart function, and peripheral vascular resistance) were recorded at baseline (5'), through the recovery protocol (30'), and afterwards (5'). RESULTS: The use of IPC during the recovery phase led to a faster recovery, stated in relative values to pre-exercise, in mean blood pressure (102.5 ± 19.3% vs. 92.7 ± 12.5%; P < 0.001), and cardiac output (139.8 ± 30.0% vs. 146.2 ± 40.2%; P < 0.05) in comparison to Sham condition. Furthermore, during the IPC-based recovery, there was a slower recovery in cardiac pressure change over time (92.5 ± 25.8% vs. 100.5 ± 48.9%; P < 0.05), and a faster return to pre-exercise values in the peripheral vascular resistance (75.2 ± 25.5% vs. 64.8 ± 17.4%; P < 0.001) compared to Sham. CONCLUSION: The application of IPC after high-intensity exercise promotes the recovery of the cardiovascular system, reducing cardiovascular strain. Future investigations should consider the effects on the sympathetic-parasympathetic balance, such as heart rate variability, to assess further bonds between the use of IPC and autonomous control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Artés et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy and trained subjects recovering from repeated sprint exercise (n=16). Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) vs. Passive recovery (Sham) was evaluated on Relative recovery of mean blood pressure to pre-exercise values (p=<0.001). Intermittent pneumatic compression applied after high-intensity sprint exercise accelerated the recovery of mean blood pressure to pre-exercise values (102.5% vs 92.7%) compared to a sham condition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: