Why the study?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation increase the incidence of minor cardiac biomarker elevation compared to bare metal stent implantation in patients undergoing PCI?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation increase the incidence of minor cardiac biomarker elevation compared to bare metal stent implantation in patients undergoing PCI?
Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is associated with a higher incidence of minor cardiac biomarker elevation compared to bare metal stents, likely due to higher postinflation pressures required.
May signal increased periprocedural injury risk with sirolimus-eluting stents in PCI; leaves open clinical relevance pending randomized data.
OBJECTIVES: Minor cardiac biomarker elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention has long-term prognostic significance. The sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher) has been reported to require high postinflation pressure for optimal implantation. We examined the incidence of minor cardiac biomarker elevation induced by Cypher implantation. METHODS: We measured the serum concentration of cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) 24 h after stenting and those of creatine kinase isoenzyme MB and creatine kinase before, immediately after, and 6, 12 and 24 h after implantation in patients who underwent Cypher stent (CS group; n=53) or bare metal stent (BMS group; n=57) implantation. RESULTS: No significant difference in clinical background was observed between the two groups. When a cutoff cTnI value of 0.50 ng/ml was used, the CS group showed a significantly higher incidence of cTnI elevation (35.8%, 19/53) than the BMS group (14.0%, 8/57) (P<0.05). Similarly, the incidence of cTnI > or = 0.03 ng/ml tended to be higher in the CS group (88.7%, 47/53) than in the BMS group (73.7%, 42/57: 0.05<P<0.10). Furthermore, the CS group showed significantly higher cTnI levels than the BMS group (1.32+/-2.38 vs. 0.34+/-0.91 ng/ml. P<0.001). Essentially, similar results were obtained for serum creatine kinase isoenzyme MB and creatine kinase. Among clinical, lesion and procedural characteristics, postinflation pressure for stenting was significantly higher only in the CS group (18.2+/-2.8 atm) than in the BMS group (14.0+/-2.7 atm) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that CS implantation increases the incidence of minor cardiac biomarker elevation compared with BMS. The difference in postinflation pressure could account for the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seitou et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Coronary Artery Disease