Why the study?
Does low-molecular-weight heparin improve outcomes compared to standard heparin in patients with unstable coronary syndromes?
Does low-molecular-weight heparin improve outcomes compared to standard heparin in patients with unstable coronary syndromes?
LMWH is recommended as an initial treatment combined with aspirin for unstable coronary syndromes and shows potential benefits in acute myocardial infarction and angioplasty.
Supports LMWH with aspirin in unstable syndromes; hypothesis-generating for MI adjunctive use, needs prospective trials.
Data from several large-scale studies have suggested that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may be superior to standard heparin therapy in the setting of unstable coronary syndromes. Studies looking at the optimal duration of treatment have produced conflicting results; however, data from a recent large trial suggest that prolongation of treatment is associated with a significant benefit. The recommended initial treatment for patients with unstable coronary syndromes is a combination of LMWH and aspirin. Stablilized patients at moderate or high risk - such as those with ST-segment depression or increased troponin levels - should continue with this treatment until they have undergone coronary angiography and, if appropriate, an invasive procedure. In a recent small study among patients with acute myocardial infarction, the use of LMWH as an adjunct to streptokinase produced significant therapeutic benefits. Other potential uses for LMWH include a role in angioplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lars Wallentin (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: