Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies optimal vineyard and apple orchard locations in mountainous regions, suggesting improved agricultural planning.
Climate change is expected to negatively impact agricultural production, leading to phenological and metabolic changes, increased water demands, diminished yields, and changed organoleptic characteristics, restricting the positive geographic productivity potential. As an adaptive strategy, agriculture in mountainous regions has gained prominence despite the fact that it entails new challenges. Indeed, mountain-specific conditions and limitations need to be considered, compared to the traditional productive regions. Consequently, there is a lack of information about the most suitable locations because the new conditions and limitations need to be accounted for. This study provides a crop suitability assessment approach to be used in mountainous regions where data about crop yield or development is scarce or nonexistent. Specifically, we evaluated the suitability of vineyards and apple orchards in the southern Pyrenees and Pre-Pyrenees. Using Geographical Information System (GIS) techniques, integrated with fuzzy logic and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), we combined traditional climatic, soil, and topographic indicators with factors relevant to mountainous regions. Our results indicated that the most suitable areas were primarily in lower basins and sunny hillsides, with smaller water needs. Vineyards would benefit from a very low risk of late spring frosts and elevated solar radiation, whereas apple orchards from a reduced risk of hailstorms, a very low risk of late spring frosts, and mild slopes. The fuzzy membership functions combined with the AHP facilitated the integration of indicators, effectively identifying areas with high potential for crop development. This approach contributes to landscape management and planning by offering a modifiable tool for assessing crop suitability in mountainous regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casadó-Tortosa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: