Aspirin at antiplatelet doses may exert anti-inflammatory effects in ACS via multiple pathways, but direct clinical evidence is still needed.
No trial data presented; leaves open need for direct evidence on aspirin's anti-inflammatory effects in ACS.
Vascular injury in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) involves a complex cross-talk between inflammatory mediators, platelets and thrombosis, where the interaction between platelets and coagulation factors (e. g. thrombin) is a central link between thrombosis and inflammation. In ACS, aspirin at antiplatelet doses exhibits anti-inflammatory effects as seen from the decrease in inflammation markers such as CRP, M-CSF, MCP-1 and others. These actions probably occur subsequent to inhibition of platelet COX-1-dependent thromboxane formation and its action as a multipotent autocrine and paracrine agent. This likely involves inhibition of thrombin formation as well as inhibition of secondary pro-inflammatory mediators, such as sphingosine-1-phosphate. Experimental and limited clinical data additionally suggest antiinflammatory effects of aspirin independent of its antiplatelet action. For example, aspirin at antiplatelet doses might acetylate COX-2 in vascular cells, directing the activity of the enzyme into a 15-lipoxygenase which by transcellular metabolism results in the formation of 15-epi-lipoxin (´aspirin-triggered lipoxin´), an antiinflammatory mediator. Furthermore, aspirin stimulates eNOS via lysine-acetylation, eventually resulting in induction of heme oxygenase (HO-1), which improves the antioxidative potential of vascular cells. All of these effects have been seen at antiplatelet doses of 100-300 mg/day, equivalent to peak plasma levels of 10-30 µM. Many more potentially antiinflammatory mechanisms of aspirin have been described, mostly salicylate-related, at low to medium millimolar concentrations and, therefore, are of minor clinical interest. Altogether, there is a wealth of data supporting anti-inflammatory effects of aspirin in ACS, but studies generating direct evidence for antiinflammatory effects in ACS remain to be done.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schrör et al. (2015) conducted an editorial in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Aspirin was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: