Key result
Left vagus nerve stimulation at high intensities produced complex effects on instantaneous heart rate and heart rate variability in 5 subjects, including bradycardia and biphasic responses.
Why the study?
Does left vagus nerve stimulation with the neurocybernetic prosthesis affect instantaneous heart rate and heart rate variability in subjects with intractable epilepsy?
Observational (n=5)
Does left vagus nerve stimulation with the neurocybernetic prosthesis affect instantaneous heart rate and heart rate variability in subjects with intractable epilepsy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Left vagus nerve stimulation at high intensities has complex, highly variable effects on heart rate and heart rate variability, challenging the claim that it lacks cardiac chronotropic actions.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if stimulation of the left vagus nerve (LVNS) with the neurocybernetic prosthesis (NCP) in humans is, as claimed in the literature, without cardiac chronotropic actions. METHODS: We analyzed 228 h of ECG recorded from five subjects with intractable epilepsy who had not benefited from LVNS, for effects on instantaneous heart rate (IHR) and heart rate variability (HRV). RESULTS: There were two main cardiac responses: (a) bradycardia, and (b) tachycardia during the first half, followed by bradycardia during the second half of stimulation (biphasic response). Multiphasic responses characterized by alternating bradycardia and tachycardia were rarely observed. HRV was either increased or decreased depending on the subject and on the stimulation parameters. HRV as a function of HR also showed high interindividual variability, and interestingly, in one case behaved paradoxically, increasing at higher and decreasing at lower heart rates. CONCLUSIONS: LVNS at high intensities has complex effects on IHR and HRV, which show large interindividual variability. These spectra of cardiac responses reflect the interplay of autonomic, visceral, and somatic sensory afferences and the role of central structures in their integration. These findings also point to the need for more comprehensive studies of cardiac function in humans implanted with the NCP, using sensitive methods for data processing and analysis such as those developed for this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frei et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Intractable epilepsy (n=5). Left vagus nerve stimulation (LVNS) with the neurocybernetic prosthesis (NCP) was evaluated on Instantaneous heart rate (IHR) and heart rate variability (HRV). Left vagus nerve stimulation at high intensities produced complex effects on instantaneous heart rate and heart rate variability in 5 subjects, including bradycardia and biphasic responses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: