Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Aim: Mathematics learning is a dynamic process marked by conceptual complexity and variable performance over time. In the Philippine context, most studies rely on year-end summaries, overlooking how performance evolves throughout the academic year. This study traced quarterly trends in mathematics performance among 168 Grade 10 students from a public secondary school and examined how sex and section-based grouping influenced these trajectories. Materials and Methods: Using archival academic records, quarterly mathematics grades (Q1–Q4) were analyzed through repeated measures ANOVA and mixed-design models. Sex and academic section (homogeneously grouped by prior performance) were treated as between-subject factors. Statistical assumptions were tested, and Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons were performed to examine significant differences across time and subgroups. Results: Significant main effects were found for time (F (3, 495) = 57.50, p < .001), sex (F (1, 165) = 7.08, p = .009), and section (F (3, 159) = 90.00, p < .001), with additional interaction effects observed. Female students and those in higher-ranked sections consistently outperformed their peers. Performance trends were non-linear, featuring early gains, mid-year plateaus, and an eventual decline in the final quarter. Conclusion: These findings highlight the utility of sub-annual analysis in identifying critical shifts in student performance. By uncovering how sex and academic grouping shape performance trajectories, the study advocates for more responsive and equity-driven instructional strategies, particularly in underexamined educational settings such as the Philippines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daluma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: