Key result
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs demonstrated high usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance among patients with coronary heart disease, though influenced by external variables.
Why the study?
The current state of technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease had not been systematically evaluated.
What is the technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs in patients with coronary heart disease?
Systematic Review (n=18)
What is the technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs in patients with coronary heart disease?
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs show high usability and acceptability among patients with coronary heart disease, though external variables influence their acceptance.
Supports wider CHD telerehabilitation adoption; extends acceptance evidence by highlighting external variable mitigation needs.
BACKGROUND An understanding of the technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs is paramount if they are to be designed and delivered to target the needs and preferences of patients with coronary heart disease; however, the current state of technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation has not been systematically evaluated in the literature. OBJECTIVE We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation technology acceptance in terms of (1) the timing and approaches used and (2) patients’ perspectives on its usability, utility, acceptability, acceptance, and external variables. METHODS We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus (inception to July 2021) for English-language papers that reported empirical evidence on the technology acceptance of early-phase home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease. Content analysis was undertaken. RESULTS The search identified 1798 studies, of which 18 studies, with 14 unique home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs, met eligibility criteria. Technology acceptance (of the home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs) was mostly evaluated at intra- and posttrial stages using questionnaires (n=10) and usage data (n=11). The least used approach was evaluation through qualitative interviews (n=3). Usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were generally favored. External variables that influenced home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usage included component quality, system quality, facilitating conditions, and intrinsic factors. CONCLUSIONS Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were high; yet, a number of external variables influenced acceptance. Findings and recommendations from this review can provide guidance for developing and evaluating patient-centered home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs to stakeholders and clinicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramachandran et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Coronary heart disease (n=18). Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs was evaluated on Technology acceptance (timing, approaches, usability, utility, acceptability, acceptance, and external variables). Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs demonstrated high usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance among patients with coronary heart disease, though influenced by external variables.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: