Key result
Home-based telerehabilitation improves VO2 peak, walking distance, QoL, and reduces readmissions versus usual care in HF.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with heart failure.
Does home-based cardiac telerehabilitation improve functional capacity, quality of life, and readmission rates in patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,557)
Does home-based cardiac telerehabilitation improve functional capacity, quality of life, and readmission rates in patients with heart failure?
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation is an effective alternative or adjunct to centre-based rehabilitation for improving functional capacity, quality of life, and reducing readmissions in heart failure patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports broader use of home-based telerehabilitation in heart failure; reinforces pooled trial evidence for functional and clinical gains.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with heart failure. DESIGN: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials were designed and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. METHODS: Two researchers independently screened eligible studies. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used to assess the risk of bias within the included studies. A fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis model was used to determine the mean difference, based on the results of the heterogeneity test. DATA SOURCES: A librarian-designed search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang databases was conducted to identify studies in English or Chinese on randomised controlled trials up to 15 August 2022. RESULTS: A total of 2291 studies were screened. The meta-analysis included data from 16 studies representing 4557 participants. The results indicated that home-based cardiac telerehabilitation could improve heart rate, VO2 peak, 6-minute walk distance, quality of life and reduce readmission rates. No significant differences were observed in the left ventricular ejection fraction percentages between the home-based cardiac telerehabilitation and usual care groups. Compared with centre-based cardiac rehabilitation, home-based cardiac telerehabilitation showed no significant improvement in outcome indicators. CONCLUSION: Patients with heart failure benefit from home-based cardiac telerehabilitation intervention. With the rapid development of information and communication technology, home-based cardiac telerehabilitation has great potential and may be used as an adjunct or substitute for centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. IMPACT: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with heart failure would benefit from home-based cardiac telerehabilitation intervention in terms of cardiac function, functional capacity, quality-of-life management and readmission rate. Future clinical interventions should consider home-based cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to conventional cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure to improve their quality of life. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Our paper is a systematic review and meta-analysis, and such details do not apply to our work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=4,557). Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation vs. Usual care or centre-based cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Heart rate, VO2 peak, 6-minute walk distance, quality of life, readmission rates, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation improved VO2 peak, walking distance, quality of life, and readmission rates compared to usual care across 16 studies and 4557 heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: