Key result
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation significantly improved physical function on the six-minute walking test (MD 16.59) compared to control in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
Recent advances in telecommunications technology raised the possibility of telehealth delivering cardiac telerehabilitation after PCI, but its effects required investigation.
Does home-based cardiac telerehabilitation improve physical function and quality of life in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Population
5 articles of patients undergoing PCI
Comparison
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation vs control
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports home-based cardiac telerehabilitation post-PCI; extends evidence for remote functional gains beyond center-based programs.
Meta-Analysis (n=585)
Does home-based cardiac telerehabilitation improve physical function and quality of life in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Mean Difference: 16.59 (95% CI 7.13–26.06)
p-value: p=0.0006
Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation significantly improves physical exercise capacity (6MWT), systolic blood pressure, and lipid profiles in patients after PCI, though it does not significantly improve quality of life compared to usual care.
Zhong et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease post-percutaneous coronary intervention (n=585). Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation vs. Usual care or active outpatient cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Six-minute walking test (6MWT) (MD 16.59, 95% CI 7.13 to 26.06, p=0.0006). Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation significantly improved physical function on the six-minute walking test (MD 16.59) compared to control in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: