Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 15, 2022MedicineOpen Access

Effects of telecardiac rehabilitation on coronary heart disease: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Telecardiac rehabilitation showed similar effects to center-based rehabilitation across most parameters (P>0.05), except for total cholesterol and mental quality of life (P<0.05).

Why the study?

To investigate the effectiveness of telecardiac rehabilitation compared to center-based rehabilitation on cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood lipids, body composition, and quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease.

Does telecardiac rehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood lipids, body composition, and quality of life compared to center-based rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease?

Population

750 participants across 8 studies with coronary heart disease

Comparison

Telecardiac rehabilitation vs center-based rehabilitation

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors

YCYoo Jin ChooYeungnam University CollegeMCMin Cheol ChangYeungnam University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports telecardiac rehabilitation as an alternative to increase participation; confirms equivalence to center-based programs for most outcomes in coronary heart disease.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=750)

Structured PICO

Does telecardiac rehabilitation improve cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood lipids, body composition, and quality of life compared to center-based rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease?

P
Population
750 participants with coronary heart disease across 8 randomized controlled trials.
I
Intervention
Telecardiac rehabilitation
C
Comparator
Center-based rehabilitation
O
Outcome
Cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood lipids, body composition, and quality of life

Main Result

p-value: p=>0.05

Telecardiac rehabilitation provides similar benefits to center-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease, supporting its use as an alternative to increase participation in cardiac rehabilitation.

Cite This Study

Choo et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in coronary heart disease (n=750). Telecardiac rehabilitation vs. Center-based rehabilitation was evaluated on Cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood lipids, body composition, and quality of life (p=>0.05). Telecardiac rehabilitation showed similar effects to center-based rehabilitation across most parameters (P>0.05), except for total cholesterol and mental quality of life (P<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a215614baff55cd0402fcc5https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000029459
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A New Model of Home-Based Telemonitored Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Heart Failure: Effectiveness, Quality of Life, and Adherence2009 · 239 citations
  2. 2Power walking based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in patients with post‐coronary angioplasty: Randomized control trial2021 · 6 citations
  3. 3Remote cardiac rehabilitation is a good alternative of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in the COVID-19 era2020 · 79 citations
  4. 4A controlled trial of hospital versus home-based exercise in cardiac patients2002 · 160 citations
  5. 5Psychosocial components of cardiac recovery and rehabilitation attendance2001 · 68 citations