Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compares efficiencies of five Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models in terms of value at risk (VaR) backtesting on the number of prediction failures and the average deviation between VaR and realized return series. Unlike the previous literature which presumes constant correlation coefficients, a new model proposed by Engle (2002 Engle, R. 2002. Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20: 339–50. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], the DCC model) is applied to highlight time-varying conditional correlations amongst positions, which is essential for portfolio risk management. From the empirical studies of exchange rates data including the US Dollar to British Pound, Japanese Yen and Euro Dollar, we find that the DCC model produces least prediction failures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ku et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: