Key result
A systematic review of 14 studies evaluating coping strategies after stroke found that 10 different coping measures were used, with definitions of coping and psychometric properties under-reported.
Why the study?
What measures are used to quantify coping strategies after stroke and what are their psychometric properties?
Systematic Review
What measures are used to quantify coping strategies after stroke and what are their psychometric properties?
This review highlights the lack of standardized definitions and validated psychometric measures for assessing coping strategies in stroke survivors, emphasizing the need for more rigorous future studies.
Heterogeneous coping measures with under-reported psychometrics limit reliable assessment post-stroke; challenges standardization and validation in future research.
The coping strategies that people use after a stroke may influence recovery. Coping measures are generally used to assess the mediating behaviour between a stressor (ie, disease or condition) and the physical or psychological outcome of an individual. This review evaluates measures that quantified coping strategies in studies on psychological adaptation to stroke. The main aspects of the coping measures reviewed were (a) conceptual basis; (b) coping domains assessed; (c) coping strategies used after a stroke; and (d) psychometric properties of coping measures used in studies assessing patients with stroke. Four databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Cochrane Systematic Reviews) were searched to identify studies that used a coping measure in stroke. 14 studies assessed coping strategies in patients after stroke. Ten different coping measures were used, and the studies reviewed had many limitations. Few studies provided definitions of "coping" and the psychometric properties of the coping measures were under-reported. The need for future studies to more clearly define the coping process and to present data on the reliability and validity of the measures used is emphasised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donnellan et al. (2006) conducted a systematic review in Stroke. Coping measures was evaluated on Conceptual basis, coping domains assessed, coping strategies used, and psychometric properties of coping measures. A systematic review of 14 studies evaluating coping strategies after stroke found that 10 different coping measures were used, with definitions of coping and psychometric properties under-reported.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: