Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparable performance on a compensatory tracking task was achieved with a purely digital altimeter display and with a combined digital and scale-and-pointer display. Performance of a subsidiary, light responding, task was degraded significantly when the digital task was employed. In the presence of the subsidiary task a larger change was recorded in a number of physiological variables (heart rate, muscle activity, skin resistance and respiration) with the digital than with the counter-pointer display. Thus, both performance and physiological measures indicated that parity of performance on the primary task was achieved by increased 'effort' when using the digital display.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benson et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: