Key result
Elite student athletes reported significantly fewer mental health problems compared to the general student population, with a positive dose-response relationship between training hours and mental health up to 14 hours per week.
Why the study?
Mental health problems among elite student athletes compared to the general student population, and the association between weekly training hours and mental health indicators, needed investigation.
Does being an elite athlete and higher training volume improve mental health outcomes in college and university students?
Cross-Sectional (n=50,054)
Does being an elite athlete and higher training volume improve mental health outcomes in college and university students?
Elite student athletes generally report better mental health than the general student population, with a positive dose-response relationship for training volume up to 14 hours/week, after which female athletes experience worsening mental health.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elite status linked to better student mental health; hypothesis-generating for training volume effects, needing longitudinal confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: To examine mental health problems among elite athletes in a student population, compared to the general student population, and to explore the association between weekly hours of training across mental health indicators. METHODS: Data are from a national study from 2018 of all college and university students in Norway. Participants indicated if they considered themselves to be an elite athlete, and how many hours per week they trained. Mental health problems were assessed using several well-validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Among 50,054 students, 1.3% identified themselves as elite athletes. Both male and female elite athletes had generally better mental health across most health outcomes, reporting fewer mental health problems, less loneliness, higher satisfaction with life, more positive affect, and fewer alcohol problems. Elite athletes in team sports had slightly better mental health compared to athletes of individual sports. Increased hours of weekly exercise was associated with better mental health. However, there was generally little to be gained from increasing the amount of training from 7-10 hours/week to 14+ hours per week. Female athletes who trained 14 or more hours per week reported poorer mental health across most outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This study showed that both male and female elite athletes generally had better mental health across a range of health outcomes, when compared to the general student population. The study also found a positive dose-response relationship between weekly hours of training and mental health, but also a worsening of mental health for females at the extreme end of exercise continuum. The self-report nature of this student sample means that care should be taken when generalizing to other studies of elite athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grasdalsmoen et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Mental health (n=50,054). Elite athlete status vs. General student population was evaluated on Mental health problems (HSCL-25 score) (p=<0.001). Elite student athletes reported significantly fewer mental health problems compared to the general student population, with a positive dose-response relationship between training hours and mental health up to 14 hours per week.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: