Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A 7 year Experience at the Launceston General Hospital

BACKGROUND: To review our 7 year experience of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVR) and to compare this to open repair (OR) during the same time period. METHODS: One hundred and one EVR and 65 OR patients were studied. Parameters analysed included patient and procedure details, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital admission time, and morbidity and mortality with particular emphasis on procedure-related problems. RESULTS: Endovascular grafts were deployed with successful abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) exclusion in 100 patients. Primary technical success was achieved in 84%, clinical success in 86% and secondary success in 90% of cases. Complications occurred in 63% and 88% of EVR and OR patients, respectively. Early device-related complications occurred in 40 EVR patients (40%); 24 (60%) were corrected immediately by further stenting. Late device-related complications occurred in 15 EVR patients (15%); four (27%) required additional stenting. Most of the complications in the OR group were systemic (89%) resulting in longer ICU and hospital stays (median 48 vs 17 h and 13 vs 4 days for OR and EVR, respectively). Death within 30 days of the procedure occurred in three EVR patients. There was no perioperative mortality in the OR group. CONCLUSION: Endovascular AAA repair can be undertaken successfully in a district general hospital. The majority of local and device-related complications can be corrected immediately, while those persisting beyond the initial procedure usually resolve spontaneously. EVR offers a minimally invasive approach to a problem that in the past has involved major surgery.