Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two versions of global supervenience have recently been distinguished from each other. 1 introduce a third version, which is more likely what people had in mind all along. However, I argue that one of the three versions is equivalent to strong supervenience in every sense that matters, and that neither of the other two versions counts as a genuine determination relation. I conclude that global supervenience has little metaphysically distinctive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karen Bennett (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: