Why the study?
Does atrial fibrillation rhythm at the time of CMRI reduce measured ventricular T1 time in patients with AF?
Observational (n=157)
No
Does atrial fibrillation rhythm at the time of CMRI reduce measured ventricular T1 time in patients with AF?
AF rhythm during CMRI artificially shortens ventricular T1 measurements, highlighting the need to account for heart rate and rhythm when using T1 mapping to assess cardiac fibrosis.
AF rhythm during CMRI may confound T1 mapping; leaves open whether rhythm or heart-rate adjustment improves fibrosis assessment accuracy.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with cardiac fibrosis, which can now be measured noninvasively using T1-mapping with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). This study aimed to assess the impact of AF on ventricular T1 at the time of CMRI. METHODS: Subjects with AF scheduled for AF ablation underwent CMRI with standard electrocardiography gating and breath-hold protocols on a 1.5 T scanner with post-contrast ventricular T1 recorded from 6 regions of interest at the mid-ventricle. Baseline demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics were examined using univariate and multivariable linear regression modeling for an association with myocardial T1. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were studied (32% women; median age, 61 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 55-67], 50% persistent AF [episodes>7 days or requiring electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion], 30% in AF at the time of the CMRI). The median global T1 was 404 ms (IQR, 381-428). AF at the time of CMRI was associated with a 4.4% shorter T1 (p=0.000) compared to sinus rhythm when adjusted for age, sex, persistent AF, body mass index, congestive heart failure, and renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate<60). A post-hoc multivariate model adjusted for heart rate suggested that heart rate elevation (p=0.009) contributes to the reduction in T1 observed in patients with AF at the time of CMRI. No association between ventricular T1 and AF recurrence after ablation was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: AF at the time of CMRI was associated with lower post-contrast ventricular T1 compared with sinus rhythm. This effect was at least partly due to elevated heart rate. T1 was not associated with the recurrence of AF after ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montgomery et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation scheduled for catheter ablation (n=157). Atrial fibrillation rhythm at the time of CMRI vs. Sinus rhythm at the time of CMRI was evaluated on Post-contrast ventricular T1 time (MD -17 ms, 95% CI -29 to -4, p=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: