PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2012BMC Medicine176 citationsOpen Access

The effects of multi-domain versus single-domain cognitive training in non-demented older people: a randomized controlled trial

YCYan ChengWWWenyuan WuWFWei Feng

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether healthy older people can benefit from cognitive training (CogTr) remains controversial. This study explored the benefits of CogTr in community dwelling, healthy, older adults and compared the effects of single-domain with multi-domain CogTr interventions. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, 3-month trial of CogTr with double-blind assessments at baseline and immediate, 6-month and 12-month follow-up after training completion was conducted. A total of 270 healthy Chinese older people, 65 to 75 years old, were recruited from the Ganquan-area community in Shanghai. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: multi-domain CogTr, single-domain CogTr, and a wait-list control group. Twenty-four sessions of CogTr were administrated to the intervention groups over a three-month period. Six months later, three booster training sessions were offered to 60% of the initial training participants. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS, Form A), the Color Word Stroop test (CWST), the Visual Reasoning test and the Trail Making test (TMT) were used to assess cognitive function. RESULTS: Multi-domain CogTr produced statistically significant training effects on RBANS, visual reasoning, and immediate and delayed memory, while single-domain CogTr showed training effects on RBANS, visual reasoning, word interference, and visuospatial/constructional score (all P < 0.05). At the 12-month posttest, the multi-domain CogTr showed training effects on RBANS, delayed memory and visual reasoning, while single-domain CogTr only showed effects on word interference. Booster training resulted in effects on RBANS, visual reasoning, time of trail making test, and visuospatial/constructional index score. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive training can improve memory, visual reasoning, visuospatial construction, attention and neuropsychological status in community-living older people and can help maintain their functioning over time. Multi-domain CogTr enhanced memory proficiency, while single-domain CogTr augmented visuospatial/constructional and attention abilities. Multi-domain CogTr had more advantages in training effect maintenance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-TRC-09000732.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d9e46cc9f7df1b705b5c8https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-30
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cognitive Exercise and Its Role in Cognitive Function in Older Adults2010 · 207 citations
  2. 2Long-Term Maintenance of Gains From Memory Training in Older Adults: Two 31/2Year Follow-up Studies1993 · 111 citations
  3. 3The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary Clinical Validity1998 · 2,574 citations
  4. 4Benefits of cognitive-motor intervention in MCI and mild to moderate Alzheimer disease2004 · 293 citations
  5. 5Training induced adaptations in characteristics of postural reflexes in elderly men2006 · 143 citations