Key result
Echo-transponder localization reduces LV mapping error by ~38% versus biplane fluoroscopy.
Why the study?
The ability to locate catheter position in the left ventricle relative to endocardial landmarks might improve the accuracy of ventricular tachycardia mapping.
Does an echo-transponder system improve the accuracy of left ventricular catheter mapping compared to biplane fluoroscopy in anesthetized dogs?
Does an echo-transponder system improve the accuracy of left ventricular catheter mapping compared to biplane fluoroscopy in anesthetized dogs?
An echo-transponder system provides more precise catheter localization in the left ventricle compared to biplane fluoroscopy in a canine model, potentially improving electrophysiologic mapping.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Premature for clinical LV mapping; leaves open translation of echo-transponder accuracy to human electrophysiology.
The ability to locate catheter position in the left ventricle with respect to endocardial landmarks might enhance the accuracy of ventricular tachycardia mapping. An echo-transponder system (Telectronics, Inc.) was compared with biplane fluoroscopy for left ventricular endocardial mapping. A 6F electrode catheter was modified with the addition of a piezoelectric crystal 5 mm from the tip. This crystal was connected to a transponder that received and transmitted ultrasound, resulting in a discrete artifact on the two-dimensional echocardiographic image corresponding to the position of the catheter tip. Catheters were introduced percutaneously into the left ventricle of nine anesthetized dogs. Two-dimensional echo-transponder and biplane fluoroscopic images were recorded on videotape with the catheter at multiple endocardial sites. Catheter location was marked by delivering radiofrequency current to the distal electrode, creating a small endocardial lesion. Catheter location by echo-transponder and by fluoroscopy were compared with lesion location without knowledge of other data. Location by echo-transponder was 8.7 +/- 5.1 mm from the center of the radiofrequency lesion versus 14 + 7.8 mm by fluoroscopy (n = 15, p = 0.023). Echo-transponder localization is more precise than is biplane fluoroscopy and may enhance the accuracy of left ventricular electrophysiologic mapping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Langberg et al. (1988) studied Left ventricular mapping (n=9). Echo-transponder electrode catheter vs. Biplane fluoroscopy was evaluated on Distance from the center of the radiofrequency lesion (mm) (p=0.023). Echo-transponder localization was more precise than biplane fluoroscopy for left ventricular mapping, with a distance to lesion of 8.7 +/- 5.1 mm versus 14 +/- 7.8 mm (p=0.023).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: