Key result
Higher baseline percent atheroma volume linked to ~32% greater MACE risk per SD.
Why the study?
Although IVUS has been used to evaluate medical therapy effects on coronary atheroma progression, the relationship between IVUS-derived measures of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular outcomes required investigation.
Are baseline and change in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived percent atheroma volume (PAV) associated with incident major adverse cardiovascular events?
Cohort (n=4,137)
Yes
Are baseline and change in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived percent atheroma volume (PAV) associated with incident major adverse cardiovascular events?
Effect estimate: OR 1.32 per SD increase (95% CI 1.22 to 1.42)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Greater baseline coronary atheroma burden and its progression measured by IVUS are directly associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, primarily driven by the need for coronary revascularization.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“plaque burden matters”
Baseline PAV may aid MACE risk stratification; leaves open whether IVUS-guided plaque modification improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived measures of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular outcomes. BACKGROUND IVUS has been used in clinical trials to evaluate the effect of medical therapies on coronary atheroma progression. METHODS Coronary plaque progression was evaluated in 4,137 patients in 6 clinical trials that used serial IVUS. The relationship between baseline and change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) and total atheroma volume with incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was investigated. RESULTS PAV increased by 0.3% (p < 0.001), and 19.9% of subjects experienced MACE (0.9% death, 1.8% myocardial infarction, 18.9% coronary revascularization). Greater baseline PAVs were observed in patients who experienced myocardial infarctions (42.2 +/- 9.6% vs. 38.6 +/- 9.1%, p = 0.001), coronary revascularization (41.2 +/- 9.3% vs. 38.1 +/- 9.0%, p < 0.001), or MACE (41.3 +/- 9.2% vs. 38.0 +/- 9.0%, p < 0.001). Each standard deviation increase in PAV was associated with a 1.32-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 1.42; p < 0.001) greater likelihood of experiencing a MACE. During follow-up (21.1 +/- 3.7 months), greater increases in PAV, but not total atheroma volume, were observed in subjects who experienced MACE compared with those who did not (0.95 +/- 0.19% vs. 0.46 +/- 0.16%, p < 0.001). Each standard deviation increase in PAV was associated with a 1.20-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.31; p < 0.001) greater risk for MACE. Multivariate analysis revealed that factors associated with MACE included baseline PAV (p < 0.0001), change in PAV (p = 0.002), smoking (p = 0.0002) and hypertension (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS A direct relationship was observed between the burden of coronary atherosclerosis, its progression, and adverse cardiovascular events. The relationship between disease progression and outcomes largely reflected the need for coronary revascularization. These data support the use of atherosclerosis imaging with IVUS in the evaluation of novel antiatherosclerotic therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholls et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Coronary atherosclerosis (n=4,137). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived measures of atherosclerosis (percent atheroma volume) was evaluated on Incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 1.32 per SD increase, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.42, p=< 0.001). Each standard deviation increase in baseline percent atheroma volume was associated with a 1.32-fold greater likelihood of MACE (95% CI: 1.22-1.42; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: