Key result
Tracking coil motion correction improves image quality with submillimeter accuracy across all axes.
Why the study?
Does prospective motion correction using tracking coils improve image quality in intracavity MRI?
Does prospective motion correction using tracking coils improve image quality in intracavity MRI?
Prospective motion correction using tracking coils is feasible and improves image quality for intracavity MRI.
Establishes technical feasibility ex vivo; leaves open translation to in vivo human cardiac MRI.
Intracavity imaging coils provide higher signal-to-noise than surface coils and have the potential to provide higher spatial resolution in shorter acquisition times. However, images from these coils suffer from physiologically induced motion artifacts, as both the anatomy and the coils move during image acquisition. We developed prospective motion-correction techniques for intracavity imaging using an array of tracking coils. The system had <50 ms latency between tracking and imaging, so that the images from the intracavity coil were acquired in a frame of reference defined by the tracking array rather than by the system's gradient coils. Two-dimensional gradient-recalled and three-dimensional electrocardiogram-gated inversion-recovery-fast-gradient-echo sequences were tested with prospective motion correction using ex vivo hearts placed on a moving platform simulating both respiratory and cardiac motion. Human abdominal tests were subsequently conducted. The tracking array provided a positional accuracy of 0.7 ± 0.5 mm, 0.6 ± 0.4 mm, and 0.1 ± 0.1 mm along the X, Y, and Z directions at a rate of 20 frames-per-second. The ex vivo and human experiments showed significant image quality improvements for both in-plane and through-plane motion correction, which although not performed in intracavity imaging, demonstrates the feasibility of implementing such a motion-correction system in a future design of combined tracking and intracavity coil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2012) studied Healthy volunteers (technical development) (n=5). Prospective motion correction using tracking coils vs. Uncorrected imaging was evaluated on Positional accuracy and image quality. Prospective motion correction using tracking coils provided a positional accuracy of 0.7 ± 0.5 mm, 0.6 ± 0.4 mm, and 0.1 ± 0.1 mm along the X, Y, and Z directions, significantly improving image quality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: