Observational (n=556)
Yes
In a European registry of post-MI patients with LV dysfunction receiving primary prevention ICDs, 23% received appropriate therapy, with male gender and history of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia predicting appropriate therapy.
AIMS: To evaluate clinical and arrhythmic outcomes in post-infarction cardiomyopathy patients implanted with a defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden death. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SEARCH-MI registry is a European multi-centre, prospective, observational study enrolling patients after myocardial infarction, chronic left ventricular dysfunction and an ICD implanted for primary prevention of sudden death. Data on 556 patients with at least one recorded follow-up are presented. Survey to Evaluate Arrhythmia Rate in High-risk MI (SEARCH-MI) patients were sicker than those enrolled in MADIT-II with higher New York Heart Association class and left bundle branch block. Total mortality was 10.4%. Close to one-third (30%) of patients experienced episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia. One-quarter (23%) received at least one appropriate therapy and 10% inappropriate therapy. Gender (25% males vs. 5% females, P = 0.0009) and history of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (24% with vs. 18% without P = 0.037) were predictive of appropriate ventricular therapy. CONCLUSION: SEARCH-MI represents the current clinical management of post-MI patients with left ventricular dysfunction indicated to defibrillator implant for primary prevention. European routine clinical practice was influenced by landmark trials and guidelines which impacted on the implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy in over 25% of such patients. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia identifies subjects with a higher incidence of appropriate ICD therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santini et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Post-myocardial infarction cardiomyopathy (n=556). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was evaluated on Clinical and arrhythmic outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: