Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Management of long-term depression is a significant problem in primary care populations with considerable on-going morbidity, but few studies have focused on this group. AIMS: To evaluate whether structured, nurse-led proactive care of patients with chronic depression in primary care improves outcomes. METHOD: Participants with chronic/recurrent major depression or dysthymia were recruited from 42 UK general practices and randomised to general practitioner (GP) treatment as usual or nurse intervention over 2 years (the ProCEED trial, trial registration:ISRCTN36610074). RESULTS: In total 282 people received the intervention and there were 276 controls. At 24 months there was no significant improvement in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score or quality of life (Euroquol-EQ-VAS), but a significant improvement in functional impairment (Work and Social Activity Schedule, WSAS) of 2.5 (95% CI 0.6-4.3,P= 0.010) in the intervention group. The impact per practice-nurse intervention session was -0.37 (95% CI -0.68 to -0.07,P= 0.017) on the BDI-II score and 70.33 (95% CI 70.55 to -0.10,P= 0.004) on the WSAS score, indicating that attending all 10 intervention sessions could lead to a BDI-II score reduction of 3.7 points compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved functioning in these patients, the majority of whom had complex long-term difficulties, but only had a significant impact on depressive symptoms in those engaging with the full intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buszewicz et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: