Key result
Nurse-led brief smoking cessation intervention fails to improve 12-month abstinence over usual care.
Why the study?
Does a brief smoking cessation intervention improve continuous abstinence in smokers admitted after myocardial infarction or bypass surgery?
RCT (n=540)
1:1 ratio by nurses opening a serially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope
Yes
Does a brief smoking cessation intervention improve continuous abstinence in smokers admitted after myocardial infarction or bypass surgery?
A brief, single-session smoking cessation intervention delivered by nurses during routine care is insufficient to improve long-term quit rates in highly dependent smokers admitted for cardiac events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Brief nurse-delivered cessation intervention fails to raise 12-month abstinence post-MI/CABG; challenges efficacy of minimal counseling and supports trials of intensive programs.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a smoking cessation intervention that can be routinely delivered to smokers admitted with cardiac problems. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial of usual care compared with intervention delivered on hospital wards by cardiac rehabilitation nurses. SETTING: Inpatient wards in 17 hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: 540 smokers admitted to hospital after myocardial infarction or for cardiac bypass surgery who expressed interest in stopping smoking. INTERVENTION: Brief verbal advice and standard booklet (usual care). Intervention lasting 20-30 minutes including carbon monoxide reading, special booklet, quiz, contact with other people giving up, declaration of commitment to give up, sticker in patient's notes (intervention group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Continuous abstinence at six weeks and 12 months determined by self report and by biochemical validation at these end points. Feasibility of the intervention and delivery of its components. RESULTS: After six weeks 151 (59%) and 159 (60%) patients remained abstinent in the control and intervention group, respectively (P=0.84). After 12 months the figures were 102 (41%) and 94 (37%) (P=0.40). Recruitment was slow, and delivery of the intervention was inconsistent, raising concerns about the feasibility of the intervention within routine care. Patients who received the declaration of commitment component were almost twice as likely to remain abstinent than those who did not receive it (P<0.01). Low dependence on tobacco and high motivation to give up were the main independent predictors of positive outcome. Patients who had had bypass surgery were over twice as likely to return to smoking as patients who had had a myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Single session interventions delivered within routine care may have insufficient power to influence highly dependent smokers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hájek et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in Smokers admitted after myocardial infarction or for cardiac bypass surgery (n=540). Brief smoking cessation intervention vs. Usual care (brief verbal advice and standard booklet) was evaluated on Continuous abstinence at 12 months (Mean difference -3.6%, 95% CI -12.1 to 4.9, p=0.40). A brief smoking cessation intervention delivered by cardiac rehabilitation nurses did not improve continuous abstinence at 12 months compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: