Key result
Dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography safely produced a greater increase in systolic blood pressure (38 vs 12 mm Hg, P<0.001) and peak rate pressure product compared to DSE in ALD patients.
Why the study?
DSE has lower sensitivity in patients with advanced liver disease due to vasodilation, prompting evaluation of dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography as an alternative to improve blood pressure response.
Does dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography improve hemodynamic response and maintain safety compared to dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with advanced liver disease?
Cohort (n=217)
Does dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography improve hemodynamic response and maintain safety compared to dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with advanced liver disease?
Dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography is a safe alternative to dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography that provides a better hemodynamic response in patients with advanced liver disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May safely enhance hemodynamic response in ALD stress testing; hypothesis-generating, needs randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DSE) has lower sensitivity in patients with advanced liver disease (ALD) due to vasodilation. HYPOTHESIS: Dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DopSE) may be an alternative to DSE in ALD patients by improving the blood pressure response to stress. METHODS: The safety and tolerability of DSE and DopSE were compared in 10 volunteers. The safety, adverse effects, and efficacy of DopSE were then assessed in 105 patients, 98 of whom had ALD. Dopamine was infused in stepwise fashion from 5 µg/kg/min to a peak dose of 40 µg/kg/min. Atropine was given before and in early stages of dopamine infusion up to cumulative dose of 1.5 mg. The hemodynamic responses of 98 ALD patients were compared with 102 patients with ALD who underwent standard DSE. RESULTS: In normal volunteers, systolic BP increased more with DopSE compared to DSE (61 ± 19 mm Hg vs 39 ± 15 mm Hg, P = .008). In 105 patients who underwent DopSE, none had adverse effects that required early stress termination. In the groups with ALD, the systolic BP increase (38 ± 28 mm Hg vs 12 ± 27 mm Hg, P < .001) and peak rate pressure product (RPP) (22 861 ± 5289 vs 17 211 ± 3848, P = <.001) were both higher in those undergoing DopSE versus DSE. The sensitivity and specificity of DopSE were 45% and 88%, respectively for coronary disease (≥70% stenosis) in 37 patients who had angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography appears to be a safe stress modality and provides greater increases in RPP in patients with ALD compared to DSE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khemka et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Advanced liver disease (n=217). Dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DopSE) vs. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DSE) was evaluated on Systolic BP increase (mm Hg) (p=<0.001). Dopamine-atropine stress echocardiography safely produced a greater increase in systolic blood pressure (38 vs 12 mm Hg, P<0.001) and peak rate pressure product compared to DSE in ALD patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: