Why the study?
Does sublingual isosorbide dinitrate improve the hemodynamic response to exercise stress in patients with left ventricular aneurysm and congestive cardiac failure?
Does sublingual isosorbide dinitrate improve the hemodynamic response to exercise stress in patients with left ventricular aneurysm and congestive cardiac failure?
Sublingual isosorbide dinitrate improves exercise hemodynamics in patients with LV aneurysm and heart failure, but a resting ejection fraction of the contractile section <40% predicts poor functional reserve regardless of therapy.
Sublingual ISDN may improve exercise hemodynamics in LV aneurysm with HF; leaves open effects on symptoms, capacity, or outcomes.
The hemodynamic response to exercise stress was assessed in 17 patients with left ventricular (LV) aneurysm, demonstrated by contrast left ventriculography, and congestive cardiac failure (CCF) before and after sublingual isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). Radionuclide ventriculography was performed at rest and during exercise in 14 patients. ISDN increased mean exercise LV stroke work index (LVSWI) from 31 to 39 g-m/m2 (p less than 0.001) and reduced mean exercise LV filling pressure from 38 to 25 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). Using the combined criteria of LVSWI and ejection fraction of the contractile section of the left ventricle (EFCS), no patient with rest EFCS of less than 40% achieved a good absolute response to exercise in LV performance with or without ISDN. Of the six patients with rest EFCS greater than or equal to 40% only three achieved a good response. While rest EFCS less than 40% indicates poor LV functional reserve, good LV functional reserve is not always indicated by rest EFCS greater than or equal to 40%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephens et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: