Key result
Middle-aged endurance athletes demonstrated a significantly faster heart rate recovery slope following maximal exercise compared to physically-active individuals.
Why the study?
To determine potential adverse cardiac effects of chronic endurance training by comparing sympathovagal modulation via heart rate variability and heart rate recovery following maximal exercise.
Does chronic endurance training alter sympathovagal modulation, heart rate variability, and heart rate recovery following maximal exercise compared to standard physical activity in middle-aged adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=55)
No
Does chronic endurance training alter sympathovagal modulation, heart rate variability, and heart rate recovery following maximal exercise compared to standard physical activity in middle-aged adults?
p-value: p=<0.001
Chronic endurance training is associated with faster absolute heart rate recovery and elevated parasympathetic reactivation following maximal exercise, though relative heart rate recovery scaled to baseline remains similar to physically active individuals.
May support autonomic benefits of endurance training; leaves open causal effects on outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to determine potential adverse cardiac effects of chronic endurance training by comparing sympathovagal modulation via heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate recovery (HRR) in middle-aged endurance athletes (EA) and physically active individuals (PA) following maximal exercise. Thirty-six (age, 53 ± 5 years) EA and 19 (age, 56 ± 5 years) PA were recruited to complete a 2-week exercise diary and graded exercise to exhaustion. Time domain and power spectral HRV analyses were completed on recorded R-R intervals. EA had a greater HRR slope following exercise (95% confidence interval, 0.0134–0.0138 vs. 0.0101–0.0104 beats/s; p < 0.001). While EA had greater HRR at 1–5 min after exercise (all p < 0.01), PA and EA did not differ when expressed as a percentage of baseline heart rate (130 ± 19 vs. 139 ± 19; p = 0.2). Root mean square of successive differences in R-R intervals (rest and immediately after exercise) were elevated in EA (p < 0.05). Low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) spectral components were nonsignificantly elevated after exercise (p = 0.045–0.147) in EA while LF/HF was not different (p = 0.529–0.986). This data suggests greater HRR in EA may arise in part due to a lower resting HR. While nonsignificant elevations in HF and LF in EA produces a LF/HF similar to PA, absolute spectral component modulation differed. These observations require further exploration. Novelty Acute effects of exercise on HRV in EA compared with a relevant control group, PA, are unknown. EA had greater HRR and nonsignificant elevations in LF and HF compared with PA, yet LF/HF was not different. Future work should explore the implications of this observation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bentley et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy middle-aged individuals (n=55). Chronic endurance training vs. Physically-active individuals was evaluated on Heart rate recovery (HRR) slope following maximal exercise (p=<0.001). Middle-aged endurance athletes demonstrated a significantly faster heart rate recovery slope following maximal exercise compared to physically-active individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: