Key result
Gender-specific polygenic scores explain ~10% of jump and sprint performance variance in elite athletes.
Why the study?
To deepen understanding of the relationship between genotype and phenotypical power performance in elite athletes.
Does genotype predict phenotypical power performance in elite male and female athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=278)
Does genotype predict phenotypical power performance in elite male and female athletes?
Effect estimate: R2 0.10
p-value: p=<0.001
Gender-specific polygenic scores based on selected SNPs can explain approximately 10% of the variance in power performance (jump and sprint) among elite athletes.
May modestly inform genetic profiling in elite athletes; leaves open prospective validation before selection use.
The role of power performance in elite athletes has been enriched by identifying associations between specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and power performance. To deepen our understanding of this association, the objective of this study was to explore the relationship between the genotype and the phenotype in elite athletes. A total of 278 German national squad athletes (156 males, 122 females) underwent genotyping, and their performance in a countermovement jump test (CMJ) and 10-m sprint was assessed. Genotype distribution was analyzed using Chi-square tests. Spearman correlation was employed to examine associations between selected SNPs (e.g., ACTN3, AGT, HSD17B14, IP6K3, MTRR, UCP2, and VDR) and CMJ and sprint performances. Gender-specific polygenic "Total Genotype Scores" (TGSsig) were calculated. Predictive power of TGSsig on power performance was evaluated using linear regression. TGSsig explained 10% of variance in CMJ and sprint performance in both genders. Among males, correlations were identified between AGT and VDR with the CMJ as well as between IP6K3 and sprint performance (p < 0.05). In females, ACTN3, AGT, and UCP2 exhibited associations with the CMJ, while HSD17B14, MTRR, and UCP2 were correlated with sprint performance (p < 0.05). Significant differences in genotype distribution between genders were observed for DMD and MPRIP. Our findings strengthen the idea of power being partly heritable, however, the genotype only partially, by 10%, determines power performance. The role of the athletes' genotype for individual performance development should be investigated in future longitudinal studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reichert et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Elite athletes (power performance) (n=278). Gender-specific polygenic Total Genotype Scores (TGSsig) was evaluated on Variance in countermovement jump (CMJ) and 10-m sprint performance explained by TGSsig (R2 0.10, p=<0.001). Gender-specific polygenic Total Genotype Scores (TGSsig) explained approximately 10% of the variance in countermovement jump and 10-m sprint performance in elite male and female athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: