Key result
Gastrointestinal potentially inappropriate medications linked to ~38% greater 90-day rehospitalization risk.
Why the study?
Multimorbidity and polypharmacy increase hospitalization risk in older adults receiving potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), but the predictive ability of PIM-Taiwan, PRISCUS, and Beers criteria for 90-day rehospitalization had not been compared.
Does potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) exposure increase the risk of 90-day rehospitalization in older adults?
Cohort (n=206,058)
Does potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) exposure increase the risk of 90-day rehospitalization in older adults?
Effect estimate: aOR 1.38 (95% CI 1.35-1.42)
Absolute Event Rate: 30.8% vs 22.8%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Beers criteria was more efficient than PIM-Taiwan or PRISCUS in predicting 90-day rehospitalization among older adults exposed to potentially inappropriate medications.
Beers GI PIM exposure was associated with higher rehospitalization risk; leaves open whether deprescribing reduces events in trials.
Background: Multimorbidity and polypharmacy increase the risk of hospitalization in older adults receiving potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). The current study compared the ability of PIM-Taiwan, PRISCUS, and Beers criteria to predict 90-day rehospitalization in older patients with and without PIM. Methods: The retrospective cohort study used Taiwan’s Longitudinal Health Insurance Database to retrieve quarterly information about prescribed medication for adults aged ≥65 years hospitalized between 2001 and 2018. We analyzed the association of PIM with 90-day rehospitalization using logistic regression. Results: The study cohort included 206,058 older adults (mean age: 72.5 years). In the analysis, 133,201 (64.6%), 97,790 (47.5%), and 147,450 (71.6%), were identified as having PIM exposure in PIM-Taiwan, PRICUS, and Beers criteria, respectively. PIM-Taiwan criteria found exposure to PIM affecting the cardiovascular (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32–1.41), gastrointestinal (aOR 1.26, 95% CI = 1.23–1.30), central nervous (aOR 1.11, 95% CI = 1.08–1.14), and respiratory (aOR 1.16, 95% CI = 1.12–1.20) systems significantly increased the risk of 90-day rehospitalization, after adjustment for covariates. In PRISCUS criteria, exposure to PIM affecting the respiratory (aOR 1.48, 95% CI = 1.41–1.56), central nervous (aOR 1.12, 95% CI = 1.09–1.15), and cardiovascular (aOR 1.20, 95% CI = 1.16–1.24) systems significantly increased the risk. In Beers criteria, exposure to PIM affecting the cardiovascular (aOR 1.37, 95% CI = 1.32–1.41), gastrointestinal (aOR 1.38, 95% CI = 1.35–1.42), central nervous (aOR 1.18, 95% CI = 1.15–1.21), endocrine (aOR 1.10, 95% CI = 1.06–1.15), and respiratory (aOR 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.13) systems significantly increased the risk. Patients with 90-day rehospitalization had higher rates of the potentially harmful drug-drug interaction (DDI) pairs of serotonin syndrome (n = 19; 48.8%), QT prolongation (n = 4; 30.8%), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) (n = 102; 24.5%), and hypokalemia (n = 275; 20.1%). Conclusion: Beers criteria was more efficient in predicting 90-day rehospitalization among older adults experiencing PIM in Taiwan than either PIM-Taiwan or PRISCUS. The risk of 90-day rehospitalization was associated with the potentially harmful DDI classes of serotonin syndrome, QT prolongation, EPS, and hypokalemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsieh et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Older adults with potentially inappropriate medication use (n=206,058). Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) exposure vs. No PIM exposure was evaluated on 90-day rehospitalization (Beers criteria gastrointestinal PIM) (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.35-1.42, p=<0.0001). Exposure to potentially inappropriate medications affecting the gastrointestinal system, according to Beers criteria, significantly increased the risk of 90-day rehospitalization (aOR 1.38).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: