Key result
Patients with prolactinoma had greater epicardial adipose tissue thickness (3.0 vs 2.6 mm, p<0.001) and carotid intima media thickness (0.57 vs 0.52 mm, p=0.03) compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
Hyperprolactinemia is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but the relationship between epicardial adipose tissue thickness, carotid intima-media thickness, and cardiac functions in prolactinoma patients required evaluation.
Does prolactinoma increase epicardial adipose tissue thickness and carotid intima media thickness compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=124)
Does prolactinoma increase epicardial adipose tissue thickness and carotid intima media thickness compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 2.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Patients with prolactinoma exhibit increased epicardial adipose tissue thickness and carotid intima media thickness, suggesting a higher cardiovascular risk profile despite normal cardiac function.
May indicate higher CV risk in prolactinoma; leaves open causal role and needs prospective confirmation.
PURPOSE: Epicardial adipose tissue thickness (EATT) is considered to be a surrogate for visceral fat and a novel cardiovascular risk indicator. Hyperprolactinemia has been shown to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The aim was to evaluate the association between EATT, carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), and cardiac functions in patients with prolactinoma. METHODS: Patients with the diagnosis of prolactinoma were included. The control group consisted of healthy age matched individuals with normal prolactin levels. Prolactin, fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high (HDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were measured. EATT, CIMT, cardiac systolic, and diastolic functions were determined using echocardiography. RESULTS: We evaluated 67 patients with prolactinoma (aged 40.7 ± 11.9 years, F/M: 51/16) and 57 controls (aged 42.5 ± 7.4 years, F/M: 36/21). Of the 67 patients, 24 had normal prolactin levels. FBG level was higher in prolactinoma patients than in controls. Patients and controls had similar HbA1c, HOMA-IR, ALT, total, HDL, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides levels, and similar cardiac systolic and diastolic functions. Prolactinoma patients had greater EATT (3.0 ± 0.5 mm vs. 2.6 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001) and CIMT (0.57 ± 0.08 mm vs. 0.52 ± 0.04 mm, p = 0.03) than controls. EATT was correlated with body mass index, FBG, HbA1c, and triglyceride levels. CONCLUSIONS: EATT and CIMT were greater in patients with prolactinoma, although they had normal cardiac systolic and diastolic functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yazıcı et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Prolactinoma (n=124). Prolactinoma vs. Healthy age-matched controls was evaluated on Epicardial adipose tissue thickness (EATT) (p=<0.001). Patients with prolactinoma had greater epicardial adipose tissue thickness (3.0 vs 2.6 mm, p<0.001) and carotid intima media thickness (0.57 vs 0.52 mm, p=0.03) compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: